Saturday, May 07, 2005


What? The end of the world! OH NO! Wah.

63 comments:

  1. Looks like one of the new XBox 360 logos

    ReplyDelete
  2. Crazy stuff... wonder if it's accurate?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looks like a cheap effect from Star Gate : SG-1 to me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I refer you to comment 75 on the below post, which read as follows:

    "Rob you do realise "The applet was implemented using only 2-body methods, and hence should not be used for determining accurate long-term trajectories (over several years or decades) or planetary encounter circumstances."

    I couldnt be bothered fast forwarding that far, what happened?

    11:15 PM"

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey, whats a good question to ask physics.org?

    In relation to the topics we discussed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, i've just realised something that makes this 100% accurate.

    The intro to the original Carmageddon stated that in the year 2028 solar flares would contaminate the earths atmosphere turning 80% of the world's population into mindless wandering zombies.

    I think it's fairly clear that these two events are interconnected. Maybe Ra, the egyptian sun god was trying to shoot down the asteroid with a sun gun, but accidentally hit earth instead... thus giving rise to Carmageddon.

    Ra be praised.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ask if they changed the site name to physics.orgy would it have a negative effect on space-time.

    ReplyDelete
  8. But thats impossible because Jack O'Neill and Dr. Daniel Jackson blew Rá up with an enhanced tactical nuclear weapon when he was in orbit above Abbydos. Sorry Daly, maybe it was another vengeful egyptian God. LIke Thor.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm reading about spacetime at the moment... getting the lowdown. From people who know rather than people who think they know.
    Hur hur hur.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yeah ask it the orgy question! Or if Ger wore a "I want to anally rape Beyonce Knowles" t-shirt would it positively effect space time.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It would positively effect face time... on ger... by a bouncer.

    ReplyDelete
  12. That's fucking unreal Rob. That's what you should have got on your fucking hoodie. That last three post exchange between yourself and Ian

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yeah I forgot Ra was dead. But what about that artifact they found on P3X-424? The one that opened to an alternate dimension. Where Jack and Sam were married.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I can't tell if your being negative or what, Daly. Seriously. You should drive over here and say it to me so I can hear the intonation and inflection in your voice. This just doesn't work for me. Like relativity. I just don't get it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. No seriously, that "it would positively effect face time"

    I'm still fucking lauging. I'm going to definitely use that one.

    OH YEAH

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ah yes, P3X-424, I was a fool to forget P3X-424. It is entirely plausible that a Ra from yet another dimension will open a portal to this dimension and commence anally raping us with his fleet of motherships and will then use his sun gun to shoot down the asteroid, hit us, then fuck off to the bikini quadrant because we are all zombies.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Speaking of Zombies.. go here:
    http://65.127.124.62/south_asia/4483241.stm.htm

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yeah, face-time was fucking funny. An instant classic.

    ReplyDelete
  19. If I could summarise this entire blog to a newcomer it would be with these two lines:

    "I want to anally rape Beyonce Knowles"
    and "It would positively effect face time... on ger... by a bouncer."

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yes good summary and Rob did you notice the date on that news story?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Man, I wish someone had come up to me in third year when I decided to do physics, put their hand on my shoulder and said "No son, don't bother. You'll be rubbish at it".
    That would have saved me a lot of trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  22. That story is fake. It's not on the BBC server.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I didn't even read the news story.

    ReplyDelete
  24. No way Rob, if you aint doing physics, you aint doing shit.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yes hence the date being "Last Updated: Friday, 1 April, 2005, 17:00 GMT 18:00 UK" which I already tried to point out to Robert.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Man, this is what I'm reading right now:
    Relativistic time dilation:
    The process that occurred in the blue driver's rest frame with in time Tb was perceived by the red driver to have occurred in time
    Tr = Tb / (1 - (U/c)2)1/2.
    This means that a clock appears to tick more slowly to an observer who perceives that the clock is moving than it does to an observer who is in the rest frame of the clock.

    Relativistic length contraction:
    The blue car measured to have length Lb in the blue driver's rest frame was measured by the red driver to have have the length
    Lr = Lb (1 - (U/c)2)1/2.
    This means that the length of some object appears to have a shorter length to an observer who perceives that the object is moving than it does to an observer who is in the rest frame of the object. (This applies to the length parallel to the direction of motion only.)

    Fucking physics. Fuck physics.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Forbidden time travellers travel in a circle in spacetime, which means not only are they repeating time but also they are in two spaces at once.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Not it's just written in a complicated manner. The first bit means that if you're travelling very fast you will appear to be travelling through time slowly from the perspective of an observer that isn't moving. You will however, not notice anything.

    The second bit means that an object will travelling very fast will appear shorter to an observer not moving at all.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Cool, if we get a time machine going I'll start up DalyWorld for real.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Yea, I grasped as much but the whole thing I'm reading is like that. It's a killer. All million pages of it. Interesting but grueling.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Ah man, fuck spacetime. It's bedtime for me.
    Screw you losers.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Hey Rob. Best of luck with your exams.Please read comment 80 on "survival of the shittest".
    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Daly in said comment i may have reffered to you as "socially disfunctional".Just to clarify:I believe that all the regular visitors to the house are a bit socially disfunctional, as am i.Due to the highly sensitive nature of the bloggers herein, i just wanted to clarify.I had no intention of offending you as i feel you are a friend of mine. (Plus both your arms and brain power are double the size of mine!)

    ReplyDelete
  34. Ok, I guess I should reply although the relevant parties won't read this as they have turned off. But I reply, none the less.
    M, I also regard Bond as a friend and I have no reason to hurt him, at all. Ever. Or any of you.
    What I posted about Bond was shit... a piece of fucking shit I pucked up. Shit I puked. At first, it wasn't about anybody. It was just some rubbish I wrote about a guy. But then, at the last minute, I said "Fuck it, I'll call him Bond. Oh, how everyone will laugh. Hur hur hur."
    Well, obviously, I was wrong. But I have already stated many times that it was a joke and I even wrote an even more offensive story about me. Look below, it's called Oedipus.
    But, still, I stand it and I am not going to delete any of it. Daly and Ian might have an obligation to delete it because Bond was hurt and offended... but I'm not touching it.
    Anyway, fuck it. The damage is done. I can't do anymore.
    Except M, you have me wrong. When you say the post is 'not in keeping with who you are or strive to be'.
    This blog is everything I am. Eveything I post is part of me. For better or worse.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Indeed M, no apology is expected or required. I amongst bloggers am less sensitive to harsh banter between friends. Indeed if more friends could actually tell each other when to cop the fuck on without the other becoming offended then we'd all be a lot better off in general.

    ReplyDelete
  36. GAH, I responded in the other thread. I'll move it.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Let me clear this shit of a situation up. Although I find this mega-funny, as it is the result of multiple misunderstandigs.

    As I see it, here's what happened:

    1. I make an introductory post.
    2. Bond comments that it is like something he once wrote and that I am copying him.
    3. I make a humerous post about Doc selling Bond's car for a quarter. General amusement from everyone, including Bond.
    4. I respond to Bonds comment with a parody of him copying me, in which we are both animals.
    5. A few more posts, one about Dirk Benedict as the captain of a starship, another about an Egyptian etc.
    6. Rob makes a post about James Bond. He never mentions "James" in it.
    7. Bond flys off the handle at Rob. Starts crying and wetting himself.
    8. Rob declares me a character assassin.
    9. I make a sarcastic reconciliatory post about Bond in which he helps old people and does charity work, but I can't resist the temptation and he kisses a small child in it.

    10. Seriously, if anyone is getting worked up or offended about these events then fuck them. It was a misunderstanding on Bonds part, and one that was left unchecked by me, maybe Rob too.

    11. I think this is all terribly amusing.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I'm actually getting angry at it because I have come out the bad guy. Like I'm a fucking asshole who runs around trying to insult people.
    Seriously, if I HAD wanted to insult Bond, I couldn't have done a better job than this. Fucking rediculous.

    ReplyDelete
  39. This is fucking hilarious, it's like a cheesy, american after school special.Rob, you're not the bad guy. There is no bad guy in a stupid misunderstanding.

    ReplyDelete
  40. You're right Ian, it was all Bonds fault. Why, I should mailiciously attack his character like he has obviously done mine.
    Grrr, argh... grrr again. Arghs. More arghs and a grrr for good luck.

    ReplyDelete
  41. *The Rage whispers: Yes Rob, you should. Show him what you can do. It's all his fault. He's made you look like a villain. People are sympathetic with Bond now, and they think you're just a malicious dickhead. Sympathetic to Bond? Can you believe that.



    I was going to do a *Daly whispers, with the counter viewpoint but The Rage just convinced me there.

    ReplyDelete
  42. What's even worse is that when Bond reads all this he's going to be sniggering his head off at you.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Yeah Rob listen to the rage, he is usually wrong and shit, but not this time.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I just made a chain of letters from one side of the screen to the other on that letter flash game Daly introtuced us to a while back. It was class.

    ReplyDelete
  45. The Rage is rarely wrong Ian, but you could be forgiven for thinking otherwise. He doesn't expect you to keep up, but he suggests you offer him the benefit of the doubt. It will work out well for you in both the long and short run. Though he does not mind if you refuse to, he is used to it.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I have a shot of my name made from the letters. I was thinking of using it as an avatar. Have ye both used that pic uploader thing for blogger or is there a better way?

    ReplyDelete
  47. I have used the pic uploader, Hello, and it is a load of shit. Very difficult to use.
    Try photobucket. They will host the picture and then all you do is tap in the web address into your blog profile.
    I have never used photo bucket.

    ReplyDelete
  48. is there an optimum size or will blogger resize the image automatically for me?

    ReplyDelete
  49. The picture can't be above such and such a size as far as I know.

    Also, is there anyway to make this blog private to just people who we want to read it. I just got some shit in my ear from William; a message from Mike saying to write what I used to and not like you, Daly. Apparently, I'm writing like you.
    And also that Bond is still pissed off. As far as I'm concerned now is that the whole thing is bullshit. A concoction. A lie. A charade. There is no way in hell they can be so ignorant. So, I want to make this blog a private thing between people who can handle humour and big words.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Fuck private. Everyone should be able to enjoy this blog, not just a select few because you're too much of a pussy to take some flak for what you write.

    ReplyDelete
  51. And seriously, if Bond is pissed, fuck him. It was a joke, he didnt take it that way. Both you and Daly have made it blatantly clear that you didnt set out to offend him. Fucking get over it already.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Fuck private. If they don't like it then shut the fuck up. They're giving you crap 'cos you're taking it.

    You write like me?

    Ask Mike to explain that wouldoo? - i'm not being snarky, i just want to know what he means.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I've looked it up since and I can't stop people from looking at the blog.
    Anyway, I think Bond is upset about Dalys most recent post, The Good Samaritan. As far as I'm concerned now, Daly can post everyday about Bond and I hope he does. If Bond is going to cry everytime his name is mentioned, we might as well make him drown in his own tears.
    This blog is fucking awesome and they can go shit out of their mouths. Fuck them.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Thats it Rob, take your balls off the ball and reassert yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Daly, I think what Mike meant is I was writing a post about a friend. But I don't care. I am influence by everything around me and that was slightly influenced by what you had done. But you don't tell me what to write. I write what I choose. And fuck them if they don't like it.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Ian, they are telling William what to say to me to piss me off.
    I honestly don't believe those people can be that fucking stupid as be pissed off at the stuff we write or as to stop reading this blog because it's 'negative'. Whatever that means. I think the whole thing is a fucking joke.
    If it turns out all of this is true, that they are pissed, then I have lost all respect for those involved.
    But if it turns out to be a joke, then I've only lost most of my respect for them.

    ReplyDelete
  57. When did you write about friends?

    ReplyDelete
  58. Yea, you're right. I never did.

    ReplyDelete
  59. So wtf is Mike on about?

    Seriously Mike.

    ReplyDelete